<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Models · LLMobile.news</title><link>https://llmobile.kavents.com/tags/models/</link><description>A concise news ticker covering AI on mobile devices, local models, apps and hardware.</description><language>en-GB</language><atom:link href="https://llmobile.kavents.com/tags/models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Arm recaps Arm Create China and shows Qwen3-TTS 0.6B running on a vivo X300 CPU</title><link>https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/arm-create-china-2026/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/arm-create-china-2026/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate><description>Arm has published five developer takeaways from Arm Create, its developer events in Shanghai and Shenzhen. Two of them concern on-device AI. Arm says model choice starts with the workload and not with model size alone, and that developers should decide which parts of an application stay on the device, which run on nearby edge infrastructure and which need the cloud. The Shenzhen panel included Alibaba Qwen, ModelBest, Tencent Hunyuan and Ultralytics.
In the Shanghai keynote, Shantu Roy, Arm&amp;amp;rsquo;s VP of Developer Relations, discussed the Arm AI Portal. Arm says the portal lists models validated and optimized for Arm-based platforms, together with performance data for specific targets, code and deployment workflows. Coding agents can reach the same information through the Arm MCP Server.
The recap shows the portal&amp;amp;rsquo;s evaluation of Qwen3-TTS 0.6B Custom Voice, a multilingual streaming text-to-speech model from Alibaba, on a mobile CPU. The entry lists a vivo X300 with 8 CPU cores and 16 GB of memory, SME2, the XNNPACK and KleidiAI optimizations, FP16 weights and the LiteRT runtime. It reports a real-time factor of 1.2x against a baseline of 0.28x and a median end-to-end latency of 3,878 ms against 16,877 ms. Peak memory is 4,727 MB against 6,718 MB, and the evaluation uses the English subset of the MiniMaxAI TTS-Multilingual-Test-Set.
Evaluation results in the Arm AI Portal, as shown in Arm&amp;amp;#39;s recap. Source: Arm. Arm also points to Arm CSS for Mobile 2, which combines the Arm C2 CPU Cluster with SME2 and the Mali G2-Ultra NX GPU. Arm says the platform supports new on-device AI experiences on mobile. The next Arm Create event moves to the US, and Arm has not given a date.
Source: https://newsroom.arm.com/blog/takeaways-from-arm-create-china-2026
Read the article: https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/arm-create-china-2026/</description><category>Chips</category><category>Models</category><category>Android</category><category>TTS</category></item><item><title>Ornith releases Ornith-1.5, a 9B model with a mobile build for iPhone and Android</title><link>https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/ornith-1-5/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/ornith-1-5/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0200</pubDate><description>Ornith has released Ornith-1.5, a model family with a 9B dense model, a 35B mixture-of-experts model that activates about 3B parameters per token and a 397B mixture-of-experts model. The 9B model also comes as Ornith-1.5-9B-Mobile, which the company says can be deployed on iPhone and Android devices. Ornith gives no size, memory or speed figures for the mobile build.
The 9B model scores 47.0 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 with the Claude Code harness and 70.6 on SWE-bench Verified in Ornith&amp;amp;rsquo;s tests. The company says the model matches or exceeds much larger models such as Gemma 4-31B and Qwen 3.6-35B. In the company&amp;amp;rsquo;s chart, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on SWE-bench Verified with 73.4 and on Terminal-Bench 2.1 with 52.5, while the 9B model scores 86.4 on GPQA Diamond and 54.2 on MCP-Atlas. The previous Ornith-1.0-9B reaches 43.1 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 in the same chart.
Ornith&amp;amp;#39;s own benchmark figures for the 9B model. According to Ornith, its training loop lets the model propose new tasks, generate task-specific scaffolds and produce solution rollouts, with the reward from the rollouts propagated across all three stages. The company reports that the 35B model scores 67.8 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 with the Terminus-2 harness, against 52.5 for Qwen 3.6-35B. The models are on Hugging Face, with GGUF builds of all three sizes and MLX builds of the 9B and 35B models.
Source: https://ornith.ai/ornith_1_5.html
Read the article: https://llmobile.kavents.com/ticker/ornith-1-5/</description><category>Models</category><category>Apple</category><category>Android</category></item></channel></rss>